Tuesday, February 19, 2013

Things I would like to see change in the sport of gymnastics

The Two Per Country Rule

During the course of the Olympics, I shared my thoughts on this topic in a blog post entitled "What I think of the 2 per country rule". I wrote this blog post the night after the preliminary round, very angry and frustrated after my favorite gymnast failed to qualify to the All Around finals. Looking back on that post, I still agree with a lot of the things I said. The USA, along with Russia, Romanian, and China are praised for producing some of the greatest all around gymnasts we have ever seen. These 4 country's have dominated our sport since the beginning of time and it says a LOT about their incredibly strong system that they are still able to produce top all around gymnasts decades later. I think any country that is able to do that, should be rewarded...not punished. The World Championships/Olympic Games are for all athletes to come out and show the world what they can do. However, an all around final in these events are for the best of the best. If the FIG wants to allow the top 24 athletes to advance, then they need to let the TRUE top 24 go through. When you take out the "3rd best gymnast" from each country, you are knocking out a gymnast who has the potential to medal and giving it to someone who has absolutely no shot. I feel like this rule doesn't really benefit anybody, it just hurts some of the greatest gymnasts in the world. Hopefully the FIG will re-consider the 2 per country rule for the next Olympics because I assume we will be seeing more talented gymnasts sitting on the sidelines if the rule isn't changed.

Photo credit: Gregory Bull



The Age Limit

A controversial topic in the sport of gymnastics; the age limit is another thing I would like to see change. We all know off hand a bunch of incredibly talented young juniors who miss the age cut off for the London Olympics by only a few months. It's so heartbreaking because rarely in the sport of gymnastics are we able to see a gymnast stay healthy and in top shape for TWO Olympic cycles. Look at Rebecca Bross or Samantha Shapiro. Both junior standouts in 2008, and not even close to an Olympic spot in 2012. Many gymnasts reach their peak around the age of 14-15 due to the fact that they are physically smaller and haven't endured years of treacherous training and pounding on their bodies. I think that by lowering the age limit to 14 or 15, we would see a larger depth in teams all over the world with athletes who are healthy and at their prime. I'd hate to see such talents as Lexie Priessman or Katelyn Ohashi, burn out before they reach the Olympics.

Photo Credit: Nastia Liukin




No More Tie Breakers

One of the biggest heartbreaks we witnessed at last summer's Olympic Games, was all the athletes who came so close to winning an Olympic medal, only to have it taken away due to a stupid tie breaking procedure. Vanessa Ferrari, Aly Raisman, Catalina Ponor, Nastia Liukin...all victims of the time breaking system. Why can't we give away 2 medals? These gymnasts have worked their entire life's for this moment, and they earned the scores they got. It's not fair to take away a gold medal (or any medal for that matter!) from a gymnast who rightfully earned it. The FIG states that "if no winner has emerged following the dropping of apparatus scores, the execution score total for each gymnast serve as the tie-breaker, followed by his or her total start value. If that doesn't establish a winner, the tie will stand." I know this rule confuses a lot of fans, and I hope it's something the FIG will consider changing.

Photo Credit: Unknown



Allow 7 Member Olympic Teams

Back in the good old days when Olympic teams allowed 7 members! I feel like this sort of team setup brings more variety and depth to the field, and only has positive outcomes. It allows more room for injury, more event specialists, and more talented athletes getting the chance to represent their country. I mean let's be honest, 5 member teams are brutal for countries like the US and Russia!

Photo Credit: Sports Illustrated 


No More Mandatory Stuck Landings

This rule came into effect in 2009 and I've hated it ever since. I think allowing the gymnast to take a small step back appears more elegant, and does less harm on the body. I remember watching the Chinese on floor at the 2009 World Championships and thinking about how silly they looked. Small, petite, young girls; trying so hard to stick the landing quite like the men do. Obviously as time went on, I got used to it. Maybe even a little too used to it. Every now and then when I'm watching college gymnastics, my mind naturally thinks to take a deduction when the gymnast steps back. Also the need to "stick the landing" has brought out the dreaded leaps and jumps that we see nearly every gymnast preforming. Apart from the Russians, these leaps look horrible (I'm looking at you Lauren Mitchell!) and they take away what little bit of artistry is left in this sport.

Photo Credit: Sports Illustrated 

No Standing In The Corners

The newest rule in artistic gymnastics came with the 2013-2016 Code of Points. This rule states that you may not stand in the corner of the floor exercise mat on two feet for longer than a second. Yes, you read that right! Basically, this means that a gymnast has to stand near the corner of the floor to catch her breath before moving into her tumbling pass, but not directly in the corner. Also, don't think about standing in the corner and waving your arms around. The judges aren't stupid and they will deduct if your entire body is not in motion. You can dance in the corner...but not stand in the corner and catch your breath. Sounds safe...

Photo Credit: Unknown


What sort of changes would YOU like to see in the next few years? Leave a comment below!

9 comments:

  1. I definitely agree with no more tie breakers. You can not have a gymnast who has worked so hard for a medal, and then take it away from them to give to someone who in reality, had the exact same score as you did. That is just my opinion. This post was extremely well written, and I enjoyed it a lot! Good job!!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with getting rid of the 2 per country rule for world championships - but not the Olympics. The Olympics is NOT about the best in the world. It's about the best from as many countries in the world as possible coming together to compete. That's the spirit of the entire Olympics outside of just gymnastics. Every sport has a country limit - some are imposed prior to getting to the Games and some while the athletes are at the Games by qualifiers. Either way, if the point of the Olympics was that the best in the world competed, it would look much differently and not have the spirit of the Olympics - it would be dominated by developed countries with money. However, the FIG has the right to set the spirit they want for the World Championships - why not make those about the best in the world?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Also...I think there is another new rule on beam where a connection will not be counted unless it is done RIGHT away and your arms don't swing forwards or back. That makes no sense! Most skills you need to bring your arms forwards/backwards. The rule changes are getting ridiculous.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Can't think of anything than all of these..... so well said and I totally approve. (I actually think that Lauren Mitchell's leaps were one of the better ones...) Basically, let's just go back to 1996 Atlanta. And.... the stand on two feet in the corner.... now they all stand NEAR the corner or they just stand on one foot XD

    ReplyDelete
  5. I don't agree with your opinion on 2 per country rule. The rule was put there because the U.S. and other small countries pushed for it, but it was also added after the 2000 Olympics when Romania swept up all the medals in the All-Around.

    I agree with Tie breaker, like it would kill the FIG to give gymnasts 2 bronze and 2 silver, not sure about 2 gold. Also the age limit, I think it would be acceptable to lower it to 14 1/2 or 15. And yes 7 team member, it would leave room for 4 All Arouders and 3 event specialist.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I totally agree with you on everything up there except the corner-standing rule and the step-back rule.
    I think making the gymnasts having to stick their landings is one of the good decisions, stuck landings show control. And besides, you have to admit that they don't look that pretty at all. Back in the 90s or 80s gymnasts can do a pretty step back with a pretty hand gesture but now no more.
    As for the corner standing rule, it certainly improves choreography. I hate seeing some gymnasts especially viktoria komova just standing there doing nothing while the music is going on, while some gymnasts like wieber make an effort to move all the time. Besides, isn't the point of floor to make it all seem flawless? Standing in a corner certainly doesn't look flawless, even when Russians are doing it.
    I would also like to see a clearer definition of "artistry" in the sport. One of the most heated arguments of the gymnastics world is whether one set is artistic enough or not. Here's the question--WHAT IS ARTISTRY? Would you say raisman's set is unartistic? According to the CoP she is, able to interpret her music with the according movements. And yet, admit it, she can't dance to save her life. And then there are some like Mustafina, who has pretty music and pretty dance, but they don't match up at all. They don't complement each other. But, hey, she's RUSSIAN, so that's good enough right? The artistry rules in the CoP are really ambiguous and I would like to see more detail go into it.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I definitely agree with no more tie breakers, I need gymnastics mats for home where can I get?

    ReplyDelete
  8. I agree with all your facts, the two per rule and the tiebreakers mostly. My heart sunk for girls like Catalina and Vanessa. I know Mustafina and Raisman both deserved their bronzes, but I think that Catalina and Vanessa should have been able to get medals as well!

    ReplyDelete