Friday, May 15, 2015

2020 Olympic Team Size Reduction: Our Thoughts

The FIG recently announced that starting in 2020, the Olympic team size will be reduced from five members to four in an effort to include more individual athletes. Countries with more depth can try and qualify two additional gymnasts through World Cups, Challenge Cups, and Continental Championships. These athletes can compete for the all-around and event titles however, they can not be apart of the team competition.



Having only four members on an Olympic team would mean that the team final format is four athletes up and three scores count. So every member on the team must be an all-arounder. For the United States, coming up with four all-around competitors is an easy task. They are capable of putting up four athletes who can contribute mid-high scores on every event. Granted, an athlete that they are putting up in the team competition might not be the best in the US on that particular event (those athletes would likely be competing as one of two individuals- so they wouldn't be left at home.) but she can more than likely put up a decent score for the team. I'm more concerned for the countries that really rely on using event specialists in a team competition. A country like Great Britain for example may have one or two girls who are considered "true" all-arounders and the rest of the team would normally be comprised of event specialists. The same goes for many of the countries outside of the "big four". You don't see them producing four or more strong all-around athletes. They rely on specialists to boost the team score and this new rule is going to change that.

However, I think having the opportunity to qualify two individuals to the Olympics is awesome because it still allows up to six girls to compete for a given nation. If a gymnast is truly one of the best vaulters in the world and can contend for a medal- she should be able to earn herself an individual spot no problem. I don't agree that reducing the team size to four members is hurting an event specialists chances. This new rule is promoting all-around athletes without eliminating event specialists. I see it as more opportunities for everyone!

If you want to make the four member team, you have to really focus in on being more consistent and clean on every event. I think that's one of the positive outcomes of this new rule. I don't think you have to be the best in the world on each event (unless you're Simone Biles!) to make the team, but you should have at least two or three strong events and be working to make the weaker events more strong and more consistent. Let's look at Kyla Ross for example. Granted, she doesn't have the most difficulty in the world on any event, but she is clean and consistent and you know you can rely on her on any event if need be. Vault, bars, beam or floor; you know you can put her up and get a good score for the team. If you have a few events that are strong but one really weak event (think Alicia Sacramone) then you would have the opportunity to qualify as a specialist and just compete the events you're medal-worthy on.

In the end I think reducing the team size will force athletes to work closely on the events where their consistency/execution suffers. Any athlete who doesn't make the four member team could potentially still have a chance at an Olympic medal for her individual performances. After all, most gymnasts don't train their entire life to just be a team champion, they want to be an all-around champion or an event champion. I think this new rule is giving more gymnasts the opportunity to do just that.

What are your thoughts on the team size reduction? Feel free to tweet us or leave a comment below!

9 comments:

  1. Forget GB, other big 4 countries can't even produce all arounders comparable to the U.S. If this past Euros had been a team comp the 4 member team Russia sent would've walked away with a BRONZE behind Italy and GB. And yet those are their A team girls; all specialists who got medals (mostly gold). But 3/4 of them aren't AAers and the one who is tops at high 57 or an even 58. Russia didn't have anyone, besides maybe Aliya, who could pull a 59 last year (and not even The Queen herself hit that number). Similarly, these problems arise for China who depends on UB/BB specialists to catch up or pull ahead of USA (or any other team really). AAer's aren't always the people you need in a TF. Using your example of Kyla Ross; this year she isn't needed on vt, fx, or bb yet it's good that she's dependable on all them but higher scores can be gotten with others! It appears all team scores will go down from past quads but...BUT...the gaps between scores will widen. Especially the margins USA can win by. Producing multitudes of 59+ AAers is their thing and they've always stressed consistency in performance over every other federation, or at least it shows the most, that is. With so few AAer's from any federation and so little consistency among them i see unprecedented US dominance where there didn't need to be any if they had just voted down the rule change. -Kari

    ReplyDelete
  2. Why would the team format in finals change from the three up three count format? I think it could be 4 up 3 count in qualifications and still be 3 up 3 count in finals like it is now.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I read somewhere TF will now be 4 up 3 count, at least in the men's field. Not sure why though...

      Delete
  3. Yes, US will win by an even bigger margin. But even they see it as a bad move by FIG. That is the irony of it when something is advantageous to US but they also oppose it then you really know that its a bad thing. The only silver lining to it is that Mykayla Skinner would more likely get her chance to vault in EF as well as Ashton Locklear in ub EF or Alyssa Baughman in bb EF which they might not have any chance to go as part of a team otherwise...

    ReplyDelete
  4. We offer a tailored solution to today's garment manufacturing. Being a family-run business,we take care of every aspect of garment production and sales.Each garment is designed to be long-lasting, durable and competitively priced for wholesale and retail environments team jackets
    .

    ReplyDelete